ERNA Warns Republicans Over Impact of Education Disinvestments

Proposed Republican Budget Would Decimate Federal Funding to the Most Vulnerable Schools

NEW YORK, N.Y. (AUGUST 23, 2023) – Education Reform Now Advocacy (ERNA) announced a new campaign that raises concerns over the impact of Republican lawmakers’ proposed landmark disinvestment in public education.

The campaign, which targets constituents in the districts of 19 of the most vulnerable Republican members of Congress, highlights how the proposed $15 billion in cuts to Title I funding would devastate the highest need schools in their districts. The campaign calls on these members to reject their Party’s extremist budget and support critical funding for schools in their districts.

“Republicans’ proposed cuts are a slap in the face to parents and teachers across our country—particularly for low-income families and families of color who already face the greatest barriers to opportunity,” said ERNA CEO Jorge Elorza. “Voters deserve to know just how extreme Republicans have become and how little they care about providing a high-quality public education to their children.”

If the House Republicans’ budget were to pass, it would slash local school budgets by millions of dollars.

RepresentativeDistrictProposed Funding Cuts to Highest Need Schools In District
Rep. Julia Letlow(LA-5)$57 million
Rep. David Schweikert(AZ-1)$50.9 million
Rep. John Duarte(CA-13)$46.9 million
Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer(OR-5)$42.1 million
Rep. David Valadao(CA-22)$39.6 million
Rep. Juan Ciscomani(AZ-6)$34.6 million
Rep. Brandon Williams(NY-22)$33.4 million
Rep. Ken Calvert(CA-41)$32.1 million
Rep. Mike Lawler(NY-17)$29 million
Rep. Don Bacon(NE-2)$26.9 million
Rep. Michelle Steel(CA-45)$26.6 million
Rep. Marc Molinaro(NY-19)$26.5 million
Rep. Mike Garcia(CA-27)$25.8 million
Rep. John James(MI-10)$24.1 million
Rep. Lauren Boebert(CO-3)$22.2 million
Rep. Jen Kiggans(VA-2)$21.8 million
Rep. Zach Nunn(IA-3)$21.1 million
Rep. Anthony D’Esposito(NY-4)$12.7 million
Rep. Thomas Kean Jr.(NJ-7)$8.7 million
Proposed Funding Cuts to Title I Programs

“At a time when so many of our students are still struggling to recover from pandemic related-learning loss, we should be investing in more innovative, evidence-based resources—like tutoring programs and summer learning—particularly for the students who need them most, not taking them away,” added Elorza. “This proposed budget caves to extremist politics and is far out of step with what American voters want.”

##

About Education Reform Now Advocacy

Education Reform Now Advocacy is a national 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization that support legislative and policy advocacy work. It is a partner organization of Democrats for Education Reform.

DFER Applauds Congressional Democrats’ Plan to Boost Teachers’ Salaries

DFER Applauds Congressional Democrats’ Plan to Boost Teachers’ Salaries

NEW YORK, NY – Democrats for Education Reform (DFER) National President Shavar Jeffries today released the following statement on the Congressional Democrats’ plan to increase salaries for teachers:

“Democrats for Education Reform applauds Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi for announcing their plan today to take the tax cuts Republicans gave away last year to the top 1% of all earners and instead use them for salary supports to attract and retain a qualified and diverse teaching force to our nation’s public schools.
This is the kind of high-level investment the public wants to see in our nation’s schools and in our nation’s teachers. The proposal reflects the high esteem in which voters hold our nation’s educators and prioritizes precious funding for policies that will benefit all Americans – not just teachers but students, parents, and a much wider swath of taxpayers – over schemes like the Republican tax bill that award the lion’s share of benefits to an elite group of the most extremely wealthy Americans.
We also hope that, as the details of this bill are fleshed out, care is taken to get highly qualified and ethnically diverse teachers to the schools, subjects, and specialty areas where they are most needed:

  • We need extra pay to attract great teachers to schools in urban and rural areas that have a hard time staffing them.
  • We need salaries that are competitive with the private sector for those professionals with knowledge and expertise in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM).
  • We need to use salaries to address shortages of teachers with special skills needed to serve students with disabilities and English Language Learners.
  • We need to fund the salaries of beginning teachers who take a year of internship or residency so we know they are maximally prepared before they head up their own classroom.

The public is willing to invest substantially in public education if it feels like it is getting a good return on its investment. We can’t think of any large investment with a better potential return, than one that gets the kinds of teachers we all want for the students that need them most.”
###
CONTACT: Ashley Johnson; ashleyj@dfer.org

Beware the Raid on Student Aid

By Michael Dannenberg

President Trump is proposing to empty over half of the Pell Grant program’s rainy day fund at a time when the economy is relatively stable. The money is not going to boost college grant aid for students already forced to borrow too much. Instead, like all of Trump’s proposed cuts to non-defense domestic spending, student aid funds essentially would be redirected to pay for Trump’s proposed military buildup. We should find out in a few days if Congressional Republicans will be complicit in shifting Pell Grant aid in support of the military buildup or other partisan priorities.

The raid on student aid is a bigger deal for domestic policy than just another politician dipping his hand into the cookie jar. It’s a bigger deal than being emblematic of the Trump Administration’s prioritization of weapons over people in its first budget. It’s a threat around which education advocates should mobilize, but likely won’t, because the interaction between the Pell Grant program and federal budget rules are obscure and the implications delayed in time. But the consequences of emptying the Pell Grant rainy day fund are very real for families.

A little over six years ago, the Pell Grant program didn’t have a rainy day fund and confronted a $5 billion deficit—12 percent of total program cost at the time. Because of a unique “balanced budget” rule particular to the Pell Grant program, Congress cut education spending outside of the traditional Pell Grant program to reconcile the numbers. We don’t have so-called summer Pell Grants for undergraduates anymore, because of past tiny or non-existent Pell Grant rainy day funds. We don’t subsidize education loans for graduate students during their repayment grace period any longer, because of non-existent rainy day funds.

The Trump Administration would have Congress set up a scenario where, once again, there’s a Pell Grant program funding crisis—this time manufactured—that leads to other domestic discretionary program cuts.  Click below for details on how.

http://democracyjournal.org/briefing-book/the-quiet-raid-on-student-aid/

The plan is reckless, spectacularly devious, or like much of the Trump-Congressional Republican agenda, both.

DFER DC’s Testimony at Budget Oversight Hearing for the Deputy Mayor for Education

Catharine Bellinger – Democrats for Education Reform
Testimony at Budget Oversight Hearing for the Deputy Mayor for Education

April 25, 2017

Good morning, Chairman Grosso and members of the Education Committee. My name is Catharine Bellinger and I serve as the D.C. Director for Democrats for Education Reform. I am here today to urge the Council to fully fund our schools by increasing the per-pupil funding by 3.5% this year.

We are at an exciting moment for public education in the District. From 2008 to 2015, enrollment in public schools has risen by 14,000 students. City leaders should look at this enrollment growth positively — as a sign that more families are confident in our public schools. We can only maintain this progress by continuing to provide adequate funds to our public schools.

Unfortunately, Mayor Bowser’s proposed budget for this fiscal year only proposes a 1.5% increase in the per-pupil funding level for our public schools. This proposal sets the Uniform Per Student Funding Formula at a level below the expected rise of inflation and does not keep pace with the rising costs for schools.

Insufficient funding poses a major challenge for schools in the coming school year. Our public school budgets are increasingly squeezed by rising personnel costs — salaries, and in particular benefits like health care. These costs are rising at a rate far exceeding 1.5%. Without a substantive increase to per-pupil funds, schools will be forced to choose between fair pay and benefits for teachers and important offerings like supports for at-risk students and art, music, and extracurriculars.

I urge the D.C. Council to remedy this gap in funding. In January, the Uniform Per Student Funding Formula working group convened by OSSE recommended a 3.5% increase to the per-pupil funding level. A 3.5% increase would fully fund our schools, keeping pace with rising costs and with inflation, and ensuring that all students have access to the resources they need. School finance experts, educators, parents, and constituents agree.

There is certainly room for excitement about the Mayor’s proposed budget. We thank Mayor Bowser for increasing the facilities allotment for public charter schools by 2.2% annually for four years. With this four-year commitment, schools can now make needed improvements to their buildings or lease facilities that are more sufficient for the size of their student bodies. We thank the Mayor for making a long-term investment that will provide tens of thousands of students with better learning environments.

But a place to learn is not enough — it’s what happens inside the building that leads to better outcomes for our kids. Students in all our public schools deserve schools where we can afford to attract and retain great teachers, reduce turnover, provide necessary in-school supports such as tutoring and counseling, and offer the activities like art, music, and extracurriculars that help make school a joyful place for kids to learn. I urge the DC Council to follow the recommendations of the OSSE working group and increase per-pupil funding by 3.5% so that our public schools can rise to these challenges.

Thank you Chairman Grosso and members of the Education Committee for your time, and for your commitment to high-quality public education for all students in the District.

Fix the Formula CT Calls For New Formula to Fund All Connecticut Students

fix forumla ct

DEMOCRAT BILL DYSON AND REPUBLICAN JOHN MCKINNEY LAUNCH EDUCATION GROUP CALLING FOR A NEW FORMULA TO FUND ALL CONNECTICUT STUDENTS

– Advocating for a new funding formula to support every child in the state, regardless of where they live

– Key to developing skilled and prepared workforce and supporting students with learning needs

HARTFORD, Conn. (March 13, 2017)Fix the Formula CT, a bipartisan group of Connecticut residents, today launched a campaign to address how the state funds students and schools to ensure it supports every child in the state, regardless of where they live.

With the support of former elected officials Democrat Bill Dyson and Republican John McKinney, Fix the Formula CT is building a diverse coalition of Connecticut leaders to advocate in favor of a single, inclusive funding formula that provides state funding based on precise student need.

“Education is economic development. Our schools create the skilled and prepared workers of tomorrow, which is essential for keeping jobs in Connecticut and attracting new businesses to the state,” said Fix the Formula co-chairs Bill Dyson and John McKinney in a joint statement. “Moreover, the state’s budgetary climate requires a funding system that helps not hurts the state.”

“As Connecticut works to right its fiscal ship, addressing how we fund public education is essential to improving the accountability, transparency and productivity of our state. The time to act is now.”

Mr. Dyson is a former State Representative and Chair of the Appropriations Committee, while Mr. McKinney is the former Senate Republican Leader who sought his party’s nomination for Governor in 2014.

In Connecticut, the amount of funding a city or town receives per child varies widely not only from one zip code to the next, but even at schools within the same district. Many schools lack the resources they need to provide their students with quality educational opportunities.

“We should never delay the resources our children require to succeed,” said Amy Dowell, Executive Director of Fix the Formula CT and Education Reform Now. “Our children and communities count on a funding formula that is predictable and ensures schools receive state funds on schedule every year. We see the conditions in the legislature to make this promise a reality.”

Fix the Formula CT proposes implementing a formula that includes 1) Core Student Funding: a base instructional amount for all students; 2) Student-Weighted Supplemental Funding: additional funding for students who require greater resources to learn and thrive in school, including students living in poverty, English Language Learners, special education students and gifted and talented students; 3) Equitable Division of Local-State Funding: a reasonable division of education costs between local and state resources based on a community’s ability to fund its schools; and 4) Effective and Timely Implementation: a commitment to fully funding a single formula and an implementation schedule to grant this funding.

Fix the Formula CT is a bipartisan advocacy campaign sponsored by Education Reform Now, a non-profit 501c3 organization. To learn more, please visit Fix the Formula’s website at www.FixtheFormulaCT.com, Facebook at www.facebook.com/fixtheformulact, or Twitter at www.twitter.com/fixtheformulact.

###

Amy Dowell Executive Director, Fix the Formula CT
amy@edreformnow.org
(917) 288-7929

You can also download the release, here.

A Parent’s Heartbreak to See College Dreams Crushed

By Marianne Lombardo

There’s no heartbreak worse than seeing your child struggle. And when they struggle to make a successful college transition, it can impact the rest of their life. In my son’s case, the public K-12 schools and the college of his dreams got paid, but he got a pink slip.

Blvd Broken Dreams

Like all parents, I wanted my kids to achieve success in life. I very purposefully moved us to one of the highest-performing (and very expensive, greatly stretching our middle-class income) suburban districts in the state to assure they would get a good education.

My son’s school experience was generally good. He got mostly good grades and easily passed the Ohio Graduation Test the first time without any issues (attaining a $500 college stipend the state provided). We found a public four-year college with a program that perfectly matched his interests and felt great that we did all we were supposed to do to launch him toward the career of his dreams.

But, it all crashed down. He only attended one quarter. He left because, surprisingly, he was not prepared for the academic demands of college. It was a surprise because it had never been pointed out by his suburban high school that his writing skills were not up to college readiness standards. That surprise deficit did him in.

struggling student
 

The program my son wanted to enroll in at college required students to attain an “A” or “B” in a required introductory course taken during the first quarter. But because of his apparent poor writing skills, he got a “C.” Crushed that he would not be able to attain a degree in the field he had chosen, he dropped out.

My son moved back home with me and enrolled in community college, where he was placed not only in a remedial writing course, but also in a remedial math course. We paid thousands for these courses, to help him relearn what he should have learned in high school, and all the while none of it counted toward a degree. He attended community college on and off for another year and a half before eventually dropping out due to work opportunities and not seeing a clear path toward how college would add value in a career field. He has never finished a college degree and is still paying back student loans.

Our story closely matches data found by my colleagues, Mary Nguyen Barry and Michael Dannenberg, in their report Out of Pocket: The High Cost of Inadequate High Schools and High School Achievement on College Affordability.”

It really hurts to see your kid not be able to attain his dream.

I feel as if our public education system failed him – both the highly acclaimed “public-private” district (where you can’t attend unless you can afford the $300K housing cost) that didn’t adequately prepare him, and the publicly-funded State University that whiplashes kids that didn’t get an adequate preparation from their high school.

I’m not saying kids should get a free pass, but our education system should be doing everything possible to help kids find success. In our experience, there was a complete lack of alignment between what we were told by the district (get good grades), what we were told by the state (pass the Ohio Graduation Test), and the reality that he did not have college readiness skills. The kicker is that once he graduated high school, the problem was ours alone: there was no responsibility or ownership on the part of the district, the state, or the college. We paid the additional price.

Our state has since increased the rigor of its state assessments, and there’s much more opportunity to get ongoing, honest, and objective feedback on how your child is doing based on these assessments every year they are tested. I hope parents understand the value of this information and use it to help if their own child needs intervention before they are cut loose from the K-12 system.

If we had better information, and if the high school had been required to provide intervention for kids that needed shoring up before they left for college, perhaps we would have been left with more than financial costs and a lifetime of wishes for what could have been.

USDOE Guidance on Equity A Big Step. But Some Provisions Raise Concerns About Political Will

by Charles Barone, Policy Director

Democrats for Education Reform applauds the U.S. Department of Education for the guidance it issued today to help ensure equal educational opportunity for all students. Resource equity is a key area where we, along with many others, have asked the Obama Administration to place greater emphasis. We’re thrilled to see today’s action. But we also have concerns whether there is the requisite amount of political will to ensure the plan presented today will ultimately result in real change.

our newsletter.